Spanking Children Against The Law?
|
Democratic California Assemblywoman Sally Lieber has announced that she will introduce a bill this week to make it a crime to spank children who are 3 years old or younger, punishable by up to a year in jail or a $1,000 fine. If this zany idea were to become law, California could be the place where the nanny state meets the authoritarian state.
It is more than ironic that a politician who wants to make it illegal for parents to apply their flat hands to their babies' bare bottoms is more than happy to allow the heavy hand of the law to yank parents from their homes and place them behind bars for disciplining their own children in the way that they see fit and does not injure a child. "I think we ought to have a law against beating children," Lieber told The San Francisco Chronicle last week. That's the problem. California does have laws against beating children. But in this politically correct atmosphere, do-gooders believe it is their right to pass laws that expand definitions beyond reason so that a spanking is a beating -- when it isn't. In effect, this is what Lieber really is saying in proposing such a law: I know how to raise your kids, and I am going to make it illegal for other parents to discipline their children in a way I do not like. If you don't do it my way, you can go to jail. That's not how Lieber sees it, of course. She told me, "I haven't heard any convincing arguments as to why anyone would want to swat a 6-month-old or 1-year-old." As Lieber sees it, spanking is "not effective," as children under 3 "don't understand it." And: Spanking trains children "in violence and domination, even when it's moderate." While Lieber may believe that she is trying to protect children, it's hard to see how a big fine or putting mom or dad in jail for a spanking could be even remotely in a toddler's interest. Let me be clear. I am not defending spanking. Like Lieber, I don't think spanking is effective and there are better ways to discipline children. I just happen to believe that California cops have their hands full dealing with adults who beat, torture or otherwise abuse children. Take the case of Oakland's Chazarus Hill Sr., 27, who beat his 3-year-old son Chazarus "Cha Cha" Hill Jr. to death in 2003 after the poor boy wet his bed and made mistakes recognizing flash cards. Cha Cha had been beaten repeatedly before his father killed him -- and I want police to concentrate on finding and going after adults like Hill. California law rightly gives law enforcement the tools to prosecute such parents -- and it is on such cases, of bodily injury, that the law should and must focus. Indeed, state law mandates that teachers, health-care professionals and cops report suspected child abuse to the proper authorities. Lieber mentioned the Hill case over the phone -- which is wrong-headed because Hill was beating his son with deadly weapons, switches and belts, for weeks before he killed him. Joseph D. McNamara, a retired police chief of San Jose, Calif., and now a research fellow at Stanford's Hoover Institution, told me that if he were a beat cop, he would be "horrified" at the prospect of enforcing a spanking ban. Such a law would put police in "everyone's living rooms," where they would have to regulate parenting. Or as Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger so aptly put it when first told about the proposed law, "How do you enforce that?" Just as some people choose not to distinguish between physical and verbal abuse. Dateline: California National Ledger | |||
